Friday, March 8, 2019

NIMBY-YIMBY debate not over after approval of westside apartment project


            The latest episode in the drama revolving around construction of a 170-unit apartment complex on Bend’s westside has concluded with opponents none too happy with a hearing officer’s decision.
            In a nearly 90-page decision hearing officer Will Van Vactor has stuck closely to the city’s zoning and comprehensive plan guidlines by approving Evergreen Housing Development Group of Seattle’s plans for a site along Shevlin Road across from the new watersports park at the Colorado Avenue bridge on the Deschutes River.
            One of the more vocal opponents of the project is a local resident who was quoted by The Bend Bulletin as saying an appeal will be forthcoming.
            Under city regulations the opponents may appeal the decision to the city council, or go directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
            Neighborhing residents and others have argued that the project would cast shadows on the park and increase traffic and parking problems. Among the opponents is Bill Smith, developer of the Old Mill District mixed-used project upstream from the park.
            The conroversy has distilled arguments from what some have called “not-in-my-backyard” or NIMBY factions and YIMBYs, who say yes to increased density with multi-family projects to ease Bend’s affordable housing crunch and prevent additional urban sprawl.
            Within the past few years the State of Oregon has approved Bend’s state-mandated urban growth bounday plan with the objective of encouraging more dense development of infill bare land already within the city limits.
            In his decision, the hearing officer turned down Evergreen’s application for an additional 5-foot height variance for the four-story building, which a developer representative said would not adversely affect the company’s plans.
            The apartment complex had earlier been approved as an administrate decision by Bend planning staff in that it met current comprehensive plan and zoning standards. But the city took the unusual step of going to the hearing process after complaints by opponents.