Friday, November 1, 2013

Metolian resort development rights transfer debated



            “Every legislative session I’ve been in, there’s been a ‘one-off’ with land use,” .... “Like Nike....we do special things sometimes, don’t we?”
            As quoted in the Nugget newspaper of Sisters, state Rep. John Huffman’s (R-The Dalles) honest comment focused on the legislative loopholes and political give-and-take in Oregon’s 1970s land use law.
            In this case Huffman was referring to objections raised in a Sisters public meeting Aug. 29  to legislation related to the “ transfer of development opportunity” (TDO) rights that emerged after earlier legislation ended plans to build the Metolian, a planned “eco-resort” in the Metolius River Basin near Camp Sherman.
            Shane Lundgren of Camp Sherman, the original Metolian developer, has been working to find an appropriate location to exercise his state-granted TDO to build another resort.
            The original TDO legislation was enacted after Lundgren’s Metolian proposal was denied when the legislature voted to establish the Metolius Basin location as an Area of Critical State Concern, effectively ending any future plans to build resorts in the basin.
            Also affected by the land use designation was a proposal by Ponderosa Land & Cattle Co. to build a resort--that could have included a golf course--in the Green Ridge area above the Metolius River. However, Ponderosa retained the right to build a limited number of homes on larger parcels in the area.
            Jefferson County had included the proposed Metolian location in mapping areas for potential resort development, as required by the state land use law.
But the special legislation overruled  the county by designating the Area of Critical State Concern.
            The legislation prohibiting the resort and subsequent TDO legislation have both been cited as examples of how the state land use law can be manipulated--by interests on both sides of a development issue.
            The TDO legislation, HB 3313, would allow Lungren to build on land not currently designated for potential resorts in economically depressed counties with chronic high employment.
            In the Aug. 29 Sisters meeting the focus of the discussion was the possibility that the TDOs could be transferred for expansion of the existing Aspen Lakes golf community east of Sisters on Hwy 126.
            The plan could allow about 480 homes, along with nightly lodging and additional recreational facilities,  to be built on 640 acres of Cyrus family land along Camp Polk Road. There are also reportedly five other possible sites considered  by the Lundgren group.
            Previously unsuccessful proposed legislation, unrelated to the current TDO issue, would have allowed Aspen Lakes to expand under designation as a  “Cyrus Heritage Farm.”
            In additional meetings in the Sisters area the discussion has moved from specific legislation to allow TDOs to be exercised at Aspen Lakes to expanding the counties in which they could be used, including Deschutes and Jefferson, the latter in which the original Metolian Resort was proposed.
            Huffman has been sponsoring the public “work group” meetings with participation of state agencies including the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Develop, Oregon Water Resources Department and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
            As quoted recently in the Bend Bulletin, Huffman said he is not anticipating new legislation that would specifically designate the Cyrus property or other land for resort development. Instead he has now said any bill be intended to include Deschutes and Jefferson among possible county locations.
            Additional meetings on the TDO issue are expected in November.