Saturday, July 16, 2011

Leading the way in Central Oregon viticulture

 
            Monkey Face Vineyard at Ranch at the Canyons is generally considered the pioneer vineyard of Central Oregon’s newly emerging viticulture industry.
            Named for the imposing Monkey Face rock spire witch looms over it from across the Crooked River, the vineyard was first planted in 2004 with substantial improvements undertaken in 2007.
            Today the approximately 2.5 acres yield several varieties of French-American hybrid grapes that have made their way into first bottlings of wines with a distinctively high desert character. Several wineries in Central Oregon have blended the vineyard’s fruit into their wines, among them nearby Maragas Winery which won a Silver Medal at the San Francisco Chronicle’s Wine Competition for its “Beat Red” that included Monkey Face grapes.
           Moreover, founders of the region’s largest new vineyard, the 15-acre Faith Hope and Charity, are bottling wine made off site from one of Monkey Face’s varietals while their vines mature.
            The evolution of Monkey Face grapes has been guided by Kerry Damon, an experienced vineyard specialist who was recruited from previous positions in California’s Sonoma County wine country.

           

Friday, July 15, 2011

Kicking it up a notch...Central Oregon wine industry expanding from the vine to the bottle.

      In its short history Central Oregon’s viticulture industry has proved several critical points and answered the skeptics.
      Now it’s taking another step on the way to becoming an integrated, vertical vineyard-to-bottle market.
      That was the scenario laid out at the Terrebone Grange in a recent gathering of the Wine Growers Association of Central Oregon.
      The meeting brought together WACO members as well as land use attorneys specializing in vineyards and wineries; Deschutes County planning officials and regional and state members of the Oregon Liquor Control Commission which enforces rules relating to wineries.
      Setting up the discussion, WACO moderator and vice president  Kerry Damon, noted that early on some members  joked that the group’s acronym was appropriate.
      Rhyming with  “whacko”  was an apt description, some observers thought, to describe any attempt  to grow wine grapes in Central Oregon.
      But Damon, a local pioneer as manager at the Monkey Face Vineyard at Ranch at the Canyons, said the doubts have been addressed.
      Local growers have answered the important questions, including whether vines will survive in Central Oregon, whether they will bear fruit and whether the fruit will ripen into quality wine grapes.
      The answers, Damon emphasized, are “Yes, yes and yes.”
      When the winegrowers association was formed in 2009 it focused mostly on the process of growing wine grapes, Damon explained. Now added to the agenda is a focus on making wine along with the legal, regulatory and economic considerations.
      In Jefferson County Doug Maragas has already established a reputation for his winemaking skills – including using grapes from local vineyards and experimenting with other varietals at his Culver vineyard.
      Just a few weeks ago Cindy and Roger Grossmann gained approval to establish a winery in association with their Faith Hope & Charity vineyard in the Lower Bridge area of Terrebonne, setting a precedent as the first permitted winery operation on agricultural land in Deschutes County.
      Scott Ratliff of Volcano Winery in Bend has been making wine from grapes sourced outside Central Oregon for several years.
      A number of other vineyards have been planted in northern Deschutes and Jefferson counties.
      A featured speaker at the June meetings was Chris Hermann, who directs the vineyard law group of Stoel Rives law firm in Portland.
      Hermann outlined some of the issues a fledgling winery must address, including options for business formation and methods register their brand, or label.
      Hermann said that since 2003 and 2004 Oregon has traditionally been the “promised land” for winery startup operations. However new state rules may tighten some aspects of running a winery, he said.
      Oregon wineries can now shop directly out-of-state without going through a wholesaler. But wineries with “custom crush” contracts can only sell wines made specifically for that winery and not from other vinters.
      Some vinters may have multiple locations in “club type” facilities open to members.
      “People are doing every imaginable thing,” Hermann observed, which in turn has brought  the industry under more legislative scrutiny.
      “I don’t think legislation is the way to go,” Hermann said. But he acknowledged that, “were going to see more and more people object to wineries in terms of the impact on rural areas.”
      Doug Maragas recounted his experience in getting his winery permit in Jefferson County just north of the Deschutes County line. Unlike the Grossmann’s winery in Lower Bridge which was permitted as an “outright use” through state law, ORS 215.452, Maragas followed the path of obtaining a conditional use permit for commercial activity on his exclusive farm use, EFU, acreage.
      Maragas, now in his fourth year of production at the Culver facility, has experimented with different grapes including viniferas such as Pinot Gris and Pinot Noir, but also making wines from French-American hybrids sourced from nearby Monkey Face Vineyard at Ranch at the Canyons.
      One of Maragas’ wines, the “Beat Red,” from Central Oregon grapes won a Silver Medal at the San Francisco Chronicle’s prestigious wine competition.
      Approaching vineyards and wineries from the county regulatory perspective, Deschutes County planning director Nick Lelack said the majority of land use applications are approved at the staff level – rather than through the “complicated and expensive” public hearing process.
      A notable exception was the Grossmann’s application, which became a matter of interpreting state law as to what qualifies as a vineyard eligible to have an associated onsite winery on EFU land.
      The eventual decision, favorable to the Grossmann’s, “was really at the Grossmann’s expense,” Lelack acknowledged. At issue was whether the Grossmann’s Faith Hope & Charity vineyard, which met minimum planting requirements of 15 acres, had to be in grape production or qualified under state law if the grapes had only been planted.      
      With the hearing officer’s decision, Lelack concluded, “many of the obstacles (to wineries) are resolved...”
      The winegrowers association is planning a summer meeting Aug. 12 at the Ranch at the Canyons clubhouse. The session will include tasting a Le Crescent wine made from Monkey Face Vineyard grapes under contract to Faith Hope & Charity. The Le Crescent was made at Pallet, a Medford custom crush facility,  by winemaker Linda Donovan.     

Friday, May 27, 2011

Winery approval final: no appeals of earlier decision

            The approval of  Deschutes County’s first winery on agricultural land became final May 25 with no appeals filed during a 12-day period following a hearing officer’s favorable decision.
            But the following day the Deschutes County Planning Commission discussed the county’s potential role in regulating activities and events associated with the winery. 
The answers, commissioners and county staff acknowledged, are not clear cut and assistant county attorney Laurie Craghead was instructed to further research state law related to wineries on land zoned for Exclusive Farm Use.
County planning director Nick Lelack and Craghead both explained to commissioners that hearing officer Karen Green’s decision approving the winery could not be modified.
Faith Hope & Charity vineyard
Lower Bridge Way in Terrebonne
Green found in favor of Cindy and Roger Grossmann’s proposal to establish a winery in Terrebonne adjacent to their existing vineyard under state law, ORS 215.452. The legislation authorizes wineries on EFU land as an “outright use” if associated with a vineyard of at least 15-acres.
The county planning staff had initally concluded that the Grossmanns’ existing Faith Hope & Charity 15-acre vineyard did not qualify as a vineyard in that grapes have yet to be produced. As their vineyard matures the Grossmanns have purchased on contract grapes from nearby Monkey Face Vineyard in Terrebonne that are being made into wine at a Medford facility.
Following a March hearing by Green, planning commissioner James Powell had written to the planning staff raising issues related to traffic and access to the winery site during special events, which are authorized under an amendment to the winery legislation.
But Craghead pointed out that no comments by county staff could be added to the record “ex parte” after the March public hearing,” explaining that any county staff involvement after the hearing “opens them up to claims of bias.”
Powell said his concern was “not about the winery per se” but that the winery approval under state law “lacked any oversight of local jurisdiction.” Among the issues he cited were access for emergency vehicles and regulation of food service and the county’s authority over the “timing and magnitude of events.”
Powell acknowledged that the Grossmanns have made a “huge investment and we would like to see that recaptured.” However, in the future Powell said he’d like to see the county develop a policy addressing events “that would be applicable across the county including wineries” while recognizing the need to support landowners attempting to derive income on farmlands.
Craghead said she would, “study this to see how we can restrict events. It’s a state statute and we’re limited on what we can regulate.”
“I don’t think we have the same authority to regulate it as we would, for example, a public park.”
Lelack explained that the issue events at wineries on farmlands is separate from those at non-winery venues. There are several bills in the legislature to address the events issue, including one that would exempt wineries approved prior to the bill. He termed the legislative process, with amendments being added to bills, “a quickly moving target.”
Lelack  pointed out that the hearing officer’s decision on the Grossmanns’ winery included conditions which the county could address as needed under its code enforcement authority.
Although some neighbors may be concerned about events at the winery, Lelack emphasized the operation is an “outright permitted use. There’s no consideration for compatibility” (with neighboring uses).
“There’s no question that should code enforcement be an issue it’s going to be very, very difficult.” Lelack concluded.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Winery approval marks a milestone in regional viticulture

            Although it will be a while before they’ll pop a cork on wines produced from grapes at their Terrebonne vineyard, Cindy and Roger Grossmann have a reason to celebrate. And the good news came on Friday the 13th .
            In a decision dated May 13 Deschutes County hearing officer Karen Green found that the Grossmann’s Faith Hope & Charity vineyard qualifies to establish an onsite winery on part of a 164 -acre parcel.
It would be the first approved for Deschutes County under a state statute allowing wineries associated with vineyards as an “outright use” on agricultural land zoned for Exclusive Farm Use, or EFU.
At issue in the decision was whether wine grapes already planted on the Grossmann’s farm in the Lower Bridge Way area met the statutory minimum requirement of 15 acres for a vineyard.
The Deschutes County planning staff had interpreted the law to require that grapes already have been produced to qualify.
However, Green wrote that, “I have found there is no requirement that the winery produce wine from grapes grown on site, but that the onsite vineyard must be maintained as a viable farm use on the subject property.”
Green also found the Grossmanns could meet a requirement that  revenue from  “incidental” goods and services, such as wedding and other events, not exceed 25 percent of those from wine sales, and that there is “direct access” by a road and easement that would not require mitigation to protect adjacent farm operations.
The proposed winery location already meets minimum setback requirements by a large margin, Green concluded.

View to proposed "barn" winery across vineyard
 at Faith Hope & Charity

Some opponents had claimed the winery would be a “pretext to create a lucrative wedding venue” Green noted. But she said that was unlikely given that the Grossmanns provided evidence of spending more than $1 million to develop their vineyard, including $375,000 for purchase and planting of vines and a drip irrigation system.
To monitor sales ratios, Green said the Grossmanns must submit an income statement to the Deschutes County Planning Division by April 15 each year to verify that not more than 25 percent of gross income is derived from sources other than wine sales.
Contracts for events such as weddings must also require that guests purchase a minimum 10 cases of wine.
The decision came five months after the Grossmann’s filed their application and followed a March 8 public hearing on the county planning staff’s report. At that hearing and in submitted comments some opponents of the winery argued that the winery and associated events would not be compatible with neighboring agricultural uses.
But Green found that, “the statutory standards applicable to wineries do not authorize the county to consider the proposed winery’s compatibility with surrounding land uses.”
She said those issues had been addressed by the legislature when it amended ORS 215.452, which authorized wineries as an accepted use on EFU land, to also allow events such as weddings.
Green also concurred with statements by the Grossmann’s attorney, Andrew Stamp, that lawmakers did not intend to require wineries produce wine only from grapes grown from their onsite or adjacent vineyards, “exclusively or at any particular time.” The legislature recognized the “apparent practice” in Oregon of acquiring grapes from other sources as their vineyards mature, she wrote.
The namesake "Three Sisters" from
Faith Hope & Charity Vineyard
The Grossmanns have a contract to purchase grapes from Monkey Face Vineyard near Smith Rock State Park . The wine will be made from those grapes for the Faith Hope & Charity label by Pallet Wine Company in Medford until their vineyard, planted in 2010, reaches production maturity—probably in three to five years. The also have a working relationship with Zerba winery in the Milton-Freewater area.
One opponent of the winery questioned whether the vineyard could produce grapes on a sustaining basis given climate and soil conditions. Green concluded that the 15 acre vineyard must remain in production for the winery to qualify as an outright use on the EFU property.
The Grossmanns have planted French-American hybrid varietal grapes similar to those which have successfully produced wine grapes for several years at Monkey Face, which is at a higher altitude. Monkey Face has also supplied some grapes used in wine made by Maragas Winery, which was approved in Jefferson County under a different standard than the Grossmann’s operation. As yet Maragas does not have 15 acres in vineyards.
French-American hybrids, such as Marechal Foch, Le Crescent, Frontenac and Leon Millot, have been found to thrive in colder climates such as the Northeast and Upper Midwest.
Other findings in the hearing officer’s decision included a requirement that food service be confined to that allowed for a “limited service restaurant.” The winery can only serve food prepared and pre-packaged in individual portions “completely enclosed in those packages.”
The decision said conditions related to the county’s approval of a guest ranch on part of the winery and vineyard parcel would remain in effect. A site plan for the property calls for the proposed winery be moved from a “barn” to another location on the 164 acres. The site would eventually include guest ranch cottages and other amenities.
Other requirements in Green’s findings included compliance with existing state liquor license rules; county plan review and building permits; adequate off-street parking; directional signage; and providing staff to control event traffic.
The Oregon Liquor Control Commission approved a liquor license for the winery in late April.